Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Old Randleman Road PUD Annexation and Rezoning→At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (11)
Presented the developer's case for the Old Randleman Road PUD project, highlighting housing needs, transportation improvements, and community outreach.
City Council Meetings · 1:15:09 →Expressed support for the development as a way to increase density and encourage grocery stores and services in the area.
City Council Meetings · 1:29:22 →Expressed opposition on behalf of neighborhood residents, citing flawed traffic studies, well water risks, and incompatibility with the rural area.
City Council Meetings · 1:32:31 →Expressed concern about stormwater runoff, well water impacts, and traffic safety near Concord Friends Church.
City Council Meetings · 1:36:40 →Warned that tripling traffic on Old Randleman Road would create dangerous conditions for local businesses and residents.
City Council Meetings · 1:38:15 →Presented hydrogeological concerns about how increased impervious surface would reduce well water recharge for surrounding domestic wells.
City Council Meetings · 1:38:50 →Noted the loss of productive farmland and environmental impacts from high-density development.
City Council Meetings · 1:40:23 →Raised concerns about road standards and access points on local roads not built for high-density traffic.
City Council Meetings · 1:41:00 →Analyzed traffic impact study limitations, arguing that road improvements would lag far behind development growth.
City Council Meetings · 1:41:37 →Spoke as a long-time public safety responder about rural road infrastructure limitations and pedestrian safety for schoolchildren.
City Council Meetings · 1:45:14 →Identified technical deficiencies, contradictions, and undocumented assumptions in the developer's traffic impact study.
City Council Meetings · 1:56:50 →